YouTube Backtracks on Throttling Ben Shapiro's Video Exposing Corporations Involved in Censorship

YouTube Reverses Decision to Limit Monetization of Ben Shapiro's Series

YouTube has decided to reverse its decision to limit the monetization of Ben Shapiro's new series, "Facts," on the platform. The series aims to challenge powerful entities that attempt to censor information and control what media is considered safe for advertising.

YouTube Faces Pressure to Reverse Demonetization

YouTube has reversed its decision to demonetize a video by conservative commentator Ben Shapiro after facing pressure from Media Research Center (MRC) Free Speech America. MRC had questioned why the video's monetization was suppressed and accused YouTube of not acknowledging the initial limitation. The Daily Wire, Shapiro's media company, had also appealed the demonetization twice, but YouTube upheld the decision. This suggests that YouTube's demonetization was intentional and not a mistake.

YouTube's Advertiser-Friendly Guidelines

YouTube has stated that for a video to earn money through monetization, it must adhere to their advertiser-friendly guidelines, which are available to the public and applicable to all creators. The statement was made in response to a review of a specific video, confirming that it is currently being monetized.

Ben Shapiro's Claims of Suppressed Monetization

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has accused YouTube of suppressing monetization for his video series called "Facts." Shapiro claims that YouTube flagged the first episode of his series as discussing a "non-monetizable conspiracy theory" related to the New World Order. He expressed his frustration on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

Ben Shapiro's Video Addresses Ad Revenue Control

The article discusses a video by Ben Shapiro that addresses the issue of ad revenue control on YouTube and other major tech platforms. Shapiro argues that the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) and the World Economic Forum are working together to influence how advertisers allocate their funds. He claims that the video provides factual information rather than conspiracy theories.

The Existence of Powerful Information Controllers

The article discusses the existence of a group of people who have significant control over the information and content that individuals are exposed to. These individuals, who remain anonymous and unknown, have the power to influence what news articles, videos, and social media posts people are allowed to see. Their decisions can have far-reaching consequences, such as bankrupting companies, silencing voices, and shaping cultural norms.

Suppression of Ben Shapiro's Video on YouTube

The article discusses how Ben Shapiro's video on YouTube has been suppressed for monetization due to its discussion of the "New World Order," which YouTube considers a non-monetizable conspiracy theory. Shapiro criticizes the ambiguous and biased framework used by entities like GARM and NewsGuard, which could potentially lead to censorship of certain content.

Elon Musk's Response to Ben Shapiro's Comment

In response to a comment from Ben Shapiro, Elon Musk suggested that a possible solution to advertising safety concerns is to price "safe" advertising higher than "unsafe" advertising. Musk also mentioned that his companies would be willing to purchase the latter type of advertising.

GARM's Guidelines for Advertising Safety

The article discusses the release of a screenshot by GARM (Global Alliance for Responsible Media) showing their "Brand Safety Floor," which outlines content that they consider inappropriate for advertising support. The article suggests that GARM's guidelines for what is considered safe for advertising are subjective, and that their corporate partners may be interpreting these rules to fit their own narrative. The screenshot shared in the article shows examples of content that GARM deems unsuitable for advertising.

Ben Shapiro's Criticism of Sponsorships at Pride Parade

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro criticized L'Oréal Groupe (specifically Garnier) and Mastercard for their sponsorships of bondage and strippers at the NYC Pride Parade. He questioned whether this content should be considered "Adult & Explicit Sexual Content" and a "Sensitive Social Issue," and raised concerns about its appropriateness and safety.

Concerns About TikTok Sponsoring LA Pride Parade

The author of the post is questioning the safety of TikTok sponsoring the 2022 LA Pride Parade. They mention that during the parade, there was a half-naked bondage group walking through and a man in drag performing for children on a giant eggplant. The post includes a video clip of the event.

Ben Shapiro's Criticism of Meta's Labeling

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro criticized social media platform Meta (formerly known as Facebook) for deeming a video of transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney as "safe." Shapiro accused Mulvaney of appropriating and insulting womanhood, claiming that the video demeans women. He shared a screenshot of Meta's decision to label the video as a "Debated Social Issue."

YouTube's Deletion of Michael Knowles' Video

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro criticized YouTube for allegedly deleting a video from The Daily Wire host Michael Knowles. Shapiro tweeted that YouTube, a member of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), considered Knowles' discussion about loving ways to respond to gender confused young people as "unsafe." The tweet included a video of Knowles.

Ben Shapiro's Tweet About YouTube's Deletion

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro tweeted about a video by Michael Knowles being deleted from YouTube. Shapiro claimed that the video, which discussed loving ways to respond to gender confused young people, was deemed "unsafe" by YouTube's GARM (Global Association of Responsible Media) member.

Ben Shapiro's Criticism of YouTube's Deletions

The article discusses a statement made by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator and co-founder of the news site Daily Wire. Shapiro criticizes YouTube for deleting content that presents the case for why certain transgender content is harmful to children or demeaning to women. He questions whether these deletions are justified and suggests that they limit free speech.

Ben Shapiro's Criticism of Disney

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro criticized Disney on Twitter for allegedly paying a man to dress up as a female mouse character aimed at children. He questioned the safety of such content and suggested that Disney's brand safety guidelines are not meant to protect brands but rather to promote a specific and extreme narrative. Shapiro called for a closer examination of the widespread implementation of these guidelines.

YouTube's Deletion of Content on Transgender Issues

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro tweeted about how content discussing the harmful effects of transgender content on children and women is being deleted by YouTube. He questioned whether these discussions are considered "unsafe."

White House Pressure on Facebook

The Daily Wire, a conservative media outlet led by Ben Shapiro, has faced censorship in the past. Recently, memos obtained by the House Judiciary Committee show that the Biden White House pressured Facebook to limit The Daily Wire's reach. This was allegedly done to promote the administration's COVID vaccine policies.

White House Meeting with Facebook Executives

In a recent development, it has been revealed that the White House held a meeting with Facebook executives to discuss pressuring the social media platform to alter its algorithm. The aim was to reduce the visibility of posts from certain entities, including The Daily Wire, which were deemed "polarizing." Rob Flaherty, the White House digital director, specifically requested that Facebook prioritize "authoritative" media outlets like The New York Times over The Daily Wire. This revelation raises concerns about potential political influence on social media platforms and the impact it may have on the dissemination of news.

Concerns About Algorithm Prioritization

During a hearing with Facebook executives, a representative from the conservative news outlet, The Daily Wire, expressed concerns about the algorithm that determines which news sources are prioritized on the platform. He argued that if the algorithm favored more authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal over outlets like The Daily Wire and polarizing figures like Tomi Lahren, there would be no way to measure the impact of such a change.

White House Official's Frustration with Facebook

The content provided reveals frustration from a White House official named Flaherty regarding Facebook's lack of cooperation in providing certain data. Flaherty expressed his desire for Facebook to "play ball" and help resolve the current situation, stating that he feels like they are "chasing their tails" and being given the runaround by some partners. He also mentioned that some partners are more cooperative than others, while some outright refuse to provide information. Flaherty expressed his frustration with the situation and his hope for Facebook to actively participate in resolving the issue.

Pressure on Facebook from External Sources

House Judiciary Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan has disclosed that a Facebook employee sent an email in April 2021 stating that the company was under pressure from external sources, including the White House, to remove certain posts. The email was addressed to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg.

Ben Shapiro's Response to White House Actions

Last week, Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, responded to the release of memos that he believes expose a violation of the First Amendment. He stated that he is pleased to investigate how the Biden White House's actions have affected his business. Shapiro argues that the government cannot force or pressure a private company to censor information, as this is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

Ben Shapiro's Stance on Corporate Censorship

In this report, Leif Le Mahieu discusses the issue of censorship by corporations and highlights the perspective of conservative commentator Ben Shapiro on the matter. Shapiro has been vocal about his concerns regarding the power and influence of corporations in controlling and limiting free speech. He argues that these corporations, particularly in the tech industry, have been engaging in censorship and suppressing conservative voices. Shapiro's criticism is directed towards the actions of companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, which have faced accusations of bias and selective enforcement of their content policies. The report suggests that Shapiro's stance reflects a broader concern among conservatives about the influence of corporations on public discourse and the need for transparency and fairness in content moderation.